Lately there's been a lot of talk about regulation. What about ICO's?
What do you see with the ones complying with governments? It seems to be a big play longevity wise.
For ex. Unikrn got their Malta license, making esports fiat wagering legal in most of europe. Does this pave the way for future ico's? Should this be an indicator of a good, trustworthy ico?
More info:
https://www.coindesk.com/regulated-cryptocurrency-betting-just-got-big-boost-europe/This must be a necessary for all ICO's to be required to operate with license so that their is assurance for the people that the sites in which they will pour their investments are safe and secured and that their hard earned money will not be lost. By regulating, the ICO will be determine if legit or not because they will be required to submit of lot of necessary documents to prove the legitimacy of their business.
It seems to me that you're oversimplifying the problem. Think about the classic banking system. In order to open the Bank to obtain a license. You are constantly under the control of the Central Bank which is the regulator of the market. It interferes with the bankers to bring the banks into bankruptcy? They just bypass the bans and deprive people of their savings.