Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Avalon chip microscope photos revealed
by
jimmy3dita
on 10/06/2013, 22:46:45 UTC
Anyone knows if the Avalon chips project is a sort of "hard copy" of the Icarus FPGA? It can explain why it has a structure like that (from the little that I know, the FPGAs are basically the same, just bigger and programmable).

By the way it's probable that you can't go lower than 110nm production process if you want to keep temperatures under control and maintain the QFN package. That's why BFL had to redesign the chip and use the FCBGA package, with that shiny upper surface (very vulnerable too, they have something of the old AMD Athlon Palomino CPUs).

Borrowing information from other products (i.e. systems on a chip like the ARM Cortex) 28nm is often a "die shrink" of an existing 32nm chip, so if Orsoc/KNC has already been able to make a 32nm chip it's not hard to think that the first prototypes will use this bigger (and less efficient) die, doing the shrink when everything is -almost- fine. It "should be" better, I still remember what happened when Intel launched the P4 Prescott series...

I forgot to mention that the BFL chip is made by Global Foundries with a production process of 65nm, and it seems they had "some problems" in the past... Cheesy