Pm this campaign managers and choose who have a good offer but i am sure they are the best campaign manager
Yahoo: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846
Atriz: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=135920
Edwardard: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=710241
julerz12: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950662
yahoo: agreeYahoo: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846
Atriz: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=135920
Edwardard: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=710241
julerz12: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=950662
atriz :agree
edwardard ;LOL most of his campaign is full of his alts and his friends alts
julerz12 : have no idea bout him/her
deadly is very good too .
i would go with yahoo and deadly .
now a day most campaign managers run the campaign with alts they own . true story
I am in a campaign currently, being handled by julerz12 and I say that he is very responsible and considerate when handling posts qualities. He reminds us of our deadline in our post in order not to miss the payment. Definitely a good campaign manager!
Not to mention, personally I think you could give other aspiring campaign managers like Harlot, TagaMungkahi etc. a chance to handle at least a campaign. They may be less-known compared to other CMs but I think they definitely are responsible enough to handle these kinds of things! Just my two cents.
I've worked with Yahoo, Edwardard and Atriz and they're all good campaign managers. I did not encounter any problems with them.
I agree that other campaign managers who are not so known such as Harlot - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2161242.0 - should be given a chance. They may not have experienced handling a signature campaign such as yahoo, atriz or edwardard but they may have the potential to handle a campaign responsibly as well as the others once they are able to prove it. Why not give these fresh blood a chance?