Again you are asking me something that I'm not able to provide. As I said I'm not an expert in any of these fields and I can't evaluate whether the tests are valid or not and you aren't either.
The experts from both sides of the debate did evaluate that, it is right in the abstract of the paper I linked you to. H. Bo¨sch, F. Steinkamp, and E. Bollers (2006) review of the evidence for psychokinesis confirms many
of the authors earlier findings. The authors agree with Bo¨sch et al. that existing studies provide statistical
evidence for psychokinesis, that the evidence is generally of high methodological quality, and that effect
sizes are distributed heterogeneously
of the authors earlier findings. The authors agree with Bo¨sch et al. that existing studies provide statistical
evidence for psychokinesis, that the evidence is generally of high methodological quality, and that effect
sizes are distributed heterogeneously
If such thing is true, why haven't we heard about it? Why are we not seeing it everyday, where are the applications?
