So everyone here wants to say that projects like Zen, which has 3.5% reward for masternodes is a "shit" project and not viable... I think i know "a couple" of people that would disagree with you.
What are you basing this on? Why is 3.5% too small? Do you have an actual argument?
There are 960 blocks/day, and 25 KMC/block. If the masternode reward is 3.5%, that is 0.035 x 960 x 25 = 840 KMC/day for masternodes. Why do you think that is too small?
If you have 100 masternodes with a 2000 KMC requirement, then each masternode gets 8.4 KMC/day. That is over 3000 KMC/year. So you turn 2000 KMC into 5000 KMC after one year, with a 3.5% reward (if there are 100 masternodes). On what basis are you saying this is too small?
Please don't argue that it should be 35% just because other coins do that. KMC looks like it is doing something different from other shitclones, so we should try to make it sustainable. If you think 3.5% is too low, provide an actual argument for why. I'm not saying 3.% is the right number, but I'd like to see someone make an actual case for something different.
This, this is so right on the spot. Only argument for such a high reward is that some of you think that they can get rich over night. This coin is not about getting rich, this coin is about usability and implementation value. XRP-like usability. You want to get rich over night? Go and try your luck with some hyped shitcoins and stop trying to influence something you can't and don't understand. Or even better, go and make your own shitcoin with 50% rewards and lets see how long that lasts. Devs, you are doing marvelous job, and dont stop. I think this project has a bright future.