That is fairly interesting. But then again to vote you need Ether in your account and I doubt many of the investors / PRG holders want to be bothered with that. I know I don't.
LdN
See this is part of the issue. People are claiming that "we knew this was part of it" regarding paying tokens to vote, yet surprisingly few (compared to money raised) people arent voting.... so which is it? Do people really believe in the project and it's not just stupid weed hype and crypto, or is it as most now think, a scheme-esque project.
I didn't read the WP, don't care to, but do holders get annual profits like 75% to holders 25% to founders? I mean we're talking primo tourist douche areas big bucks to be made.
The thing that irks me is that it's not just like send .0001 PRG per vote, and be 1 vote per address holding them. The fact that (even at their projected $2+ lel) they wanted abo it 75 cents per vote?...after you already bought the 75c off them?... you understand now?
And all you're doing is voting to buy them some freaking RE, then hope the hype from their supposed celebrity friends is gonna bring enough outsiders into crypto and prices will go stratospheric and you'll finally get that lambo in Gun Metal Blue?....
I know I'm dramatic but come on I mememberz when ether was under $3 or so on polo and I was like....wtf is this strange little guy...
Now crypto is some get rich quick investment that tons and tons of "plebs" are buying into, reinforcing the bubble and creating more and more vapory coins.
I put 1 ether into this as the 11th man theory or whatever that shit was from world war z....maybe the douchey weed hype would prove me wrong... ugh