The only thing you can do at this point is to petition the D1 users to exclude OG.
The Trust system works fairly well if the self policing works.
The Trust system works fairly well if the self policing works.
DT2 could also be petitioned to negate the feedback, assuming the DT2 member wanted to risk Og excluding them.
--snip--
It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.) It is not legitimate to keep deleting and reposting negative ratings to put the system back into "this guy just turned scammer!" mode. People who do that shouldn't be trusted.
It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.) It is not legitimate to keep deleting and reposting negative ratings to put the system back into "this guy just turned scammer!" mode. People who do that shouldn't be trusted.
Was it multiple scam accusations getting bumped or just one?
I'm surprised Og wouldn't have removed the feedback if he concluded the account owner was in fact the original but maybe I'm misunderstanding his concerns with the account.