I would like the Atriz=decoded discussion reopened myself just because I feel that could be possible.
I would disagree, but you never know.Yes I could be 100% wrong but the thread did pose some interesting thoughts before it turned into xxxx=xxxxx=xxxxx=xxxxx and went way off topic.
I don't wanna hijack this thread any longer with my offtopic bs, so i'll stick to the topic on hand from here on out.
Feel free to open up another investigation thread. If I owned aTriz's account, I would've started all the signature campaign jobs on the account with trade history, a higher rank and more posts. Why use one that was inactive for a long period of time?
(Hehe no offence aTriz, just taking a kick at you while I can
)Instead, since I don't understand how DT works & probably never will, here are the newest additions to my trust list that I appended & got mixed in after I hit Update (or maybe I should just replace my entire trust list with "~DefaultTrust" or whatever will fuck the entire membership out, because you assholes can't or won't properly manage & read feedback):
-snip-
Excluding them doesn't do what you think it does IMO. Adding ~ to someone's name, as a DT2 member has the following effects:-snip-
1) It makes their ratings worthless from your perspective. This does nothing if they are not DT1, DT2 and you don't use any lower tiers (whichever they may be on). It does not affect what others see.
2) It may discredit their own ratings.
3) Your rating still has an effect on their total trust score and will be seen by others by default.
WTF!? So that, plus "Risked BTC amount", plus "or had a successful trade"...
Can Bitcointalk's feedback system have just a single feature that isn't a steaming pile of useless shit?
I do remember reading theymos' post somewhere that the new forum was going to be released "next year". That was multiple years ago.