Just admit we cant prove or disprove such thing,and move on.
We can disprove retarded ''proof'' though. If you can't prove such thing then there is no reason to believe in it.
But you haven't been able to prove God doesn't exist. Your rebuttals to the proof that He does are simply circular reference blabber.
https://www.quora.com/Does-G%C3%B6dels-Incompleteness-Theorem-prove-the-existence-of-God
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/8475/g%C3%B6dels-ontological-proof-and-the-incompleteness-theorem
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/7013/g%C3%B6dels-theorem-and-god?rq=1
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg24030533#msg24030533
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg19455088#msg19455088
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg19350390#msg19350390
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg19357376#msg19357376
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg19355289#msg19355289
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg19666684#msg19666684
The difference between me and you is that I actually take time to review your ''arguments'' and debunk them. The only thing you can do about my arguments is saying ''simply circular reference blabber.'' over and over again as if that would change anything. You are dishonest and a liar, god will not send you to heaven if you continue like this.
The difference between me and you is that you forgot to review your own arguments. If you had, you would have debunked them by default.
Meh, took you all this time to come up with the same excuse
You haven't taken enough time to review what you say objectively. Rather, you turn your ideas into religion for yourself, so that you can believe the things you want, rather than finding the truth objectively.