Any reason why my question is not getting answered?
Which question is that?
I was asking if you're using IPFS for the storage of data and what the technical specs look like. There is no explanation at all on the website how you will achieve any of the things you promise
We will reveal and explain everything in our whitepaper which is going to be released soon.
Are you still planning to compensate for prior twitter submissions?
What do you mean by that?
Do you plan on compensating for the bouties already submitted via email. Also did you completely do away with that bounty?
Of course we will compensate for the bounties already submitted via email. We will add more bounties soon.
This is a unique project i'll give you that. And the fact that you hope to rival or even overtake one of the leading tycoons in social media make it even more interesting. I don't doubt your prowess to take on this herculean task. But am curious to know how this turns out, especially Mark Zuckerberg's reaction to this HOSTILE TAKEOVER. Nonetheless, this is an OUTSTANDING PROJECT. I wish you Godspeed.
As we previously stated, crypto users are forced to use Facebook and other platforms alike because there's no viable alternative that would match their needs. And since the crypto world is growing more and more, a lot of people finding out about it everyday, we are positive that in some years we might be able to compete with giants like Facebook and perhaps overtake them.
I am curious whether these giants might be able to transition to decentralized architectures themselves and use their existing user base as a tremendous competitive advantage or whether they will remain stagnant and watch competitors overtake them. It's not impossible for them to do a transition, they just might not be as convinced as all those being part of the current decentralization movement. I bet Facebook is exploring decentralized social networking in stealth mode for sure. Zuckerberg is not an idiot.
Although it is not impossible for Facebook to make the transition happen, it would mean that they openly agree to trading sensitive information and spying on users. But indeed , if it is absolutely necessary they will switch to being a decentralized network, and if this happens we plan on being well ahead of them.
How do you mean that they would openly agree to trading sensitive information and spying on users. Like how they operate now? Isn't it public knowledge and thus far legally ok? Most of us agree by not actively disagreeing I guess.