Yes I am serious. Did you read the paper? Are your reading skills that abysmal? The CEO appellation was clearly tongue-in-cheek! Jeebus Cripes! From the first page thereof: The Bitcoin Cash organization has no titles other than those which we make up for fun in the spur of the moment, or to make fun of the organizations of the old world that care for titles
I did. That is a hell of a lot of pages and newspeak (from a politician) to be tongue-in-cheek!
I think you are taking a huge leap of faith when you think that BCH has no structure internally and they are just joking given what is written in that doc. Please put the puzzle together, we have a politician here with connections to the EU that wants to be involved (tongue-in-cheek CEO) in a project to take over BTC. Does that not raise some red flags to you? If the project has not enough red flags, they talk about 'teams' of developers, yet the contributors are a handful.
Now, you want to 'fire' the core devs, fine. But if you want to do so,
why the hell would you want to fork a code written by the core team?!?!?!You will tell me this is not yet a red flag, so here is another...
Setgwit2x
is not a solution. BCH is not scalable. Let's assume BCH becomes the world currency, S2X is just a bit more scalable than BTC, BCH will die and the team of engineers (mostly nicknames), have hardly proven themselves.
I can go on forever, but seems listening to guys before that this is useless, so I leave it there...
EDIT: I got scammed once, and since then I've learnt my lesson and start doing some serious investigation before throwing money around