Soo from day.1 i was mining the coin, reading the ann posts.

IMHO this is the first real "test" for the community and we failed. People started talking about doing some stuff that was not in alliance with the whitepaper. You cant change stuff with wich you "bought" and got peoples interest. Halfing was put to a vote without really taking into account is it posible at the moment. Chill, take a few steps and realize the obvious.
This is a really decentralized coin we can see that in various aspects of the development. It is 70 days old for God's sake, I see no real problems with functioning as it was. I would and i am guessing many others would like a little more "transparency" to what is really going on. Just a few lines a day would keep an investor calm.

To get to the c-cex point.
 If they give Anthony back the money and delist the coin it would be a dissaster for them. They would lose trust in future coinlist payers. I dont think that they would be open to keep a coin listed for 2 weeks and then delist it because the guy who paid 4 btc decided it hasnt paid off as he expected. It would be just a sharade. I dont thing c-cex will do it.

I didnt sell and i wont sell my btcz as i am sure many others wont and didnt. People got greedy and frustrated because they didnt get a wagon of money in 70 days. Get realistic. NO PREMINE, NO DEV FEE, NO ICO and the coin is doing GREAT with the hard work from the community and the steady stearing from the devs. I see no real problems.

Btcz is a strong coin with a very active community i really do think it will payoff in the "long" run. We just have to work together and have PATIENCE.

I woulnd be that much sad/happy/scared because a developer left...it happens we move on.