Elaborating on my prior post, which I suggest reading first.


James A. Donald has the above part correct, but I think he is incorrect to characterize the root of the problem as “female bad behavior”.

Nature needs some women to be receptive to impregnation by the alpha males (i.e. R reproductive strategy), because otherwise the species would decline in quality. Nature needs men to compete for women, otherwise the men would become lazy (i.e. misallocate resources). Nature also needs most women to (at least simultaneously with R strategy) follow a K reproductive strategy (i.e. not only alpha males procreating), so that the species is adaptable to the unpredictable future wherein the current qualities of the current alpha males might be maladapted.

The problem is that when we give females contraception and the surety of marrying the State, then successful males do not want to marry females any more because they can be destroyed by females and the State. I been talking to many young engineers and they relate to me that marriage is not a benefit to them anymore. It used to be that marriage was a benefit for the male because it meant the society would enforce chastity/allegiance (to her husband) on the female and it was not an economic threat against the male’s head of household decision making power. Instead now marriage is a way to incentivize and finance the hypergamy instinct of females. This is not the fault of females or bad behavior on their part. It is the fault of men (i.e. the elders) for allowing such a society. Actually most men feel powerless to organize any solution to this problem, so they just defect and fuck women employing contraception which destroys the entire society. IOW, even if we note that some men will defect from the asymmetrical power of traditional marriage (that did not empower the women), the non-solution of enabling females to marry the State destroys those men who would appreciate marriage and destroys marriage and society completely.

Understand the mechanics. Females are taught birth control in elementary or middle school. They are taught to take control over their bodies and prioritize their education, find the best man, and to avail of all resources for her (and her children’s) maximum safety. Sounds wonderful and noble doesn’t it.

So the females go about fucking a man they perceive to be high status (because their nature and society has told them to find the best man), most successful men who fuck are defecting from procreation by employing contraception (because the State can take everything from that man when the woman later realizes she did not get the best possible man, which is an insatiable goal anyway), so women will have their heart broken dozens of times on the way towards a childless future. Or for women who defect from the contraception, they end up with multiple babies from low status men (who may even be employing bad boy PUAs strategies to fool the woman’s perception of “best man”) who do not fear any repercussions (for procreating) from the State because they have nearly nothing the State can steal on behalf of the female. Rather the State will tax the successful men to pay for the marriage of the women to the State and procreation of the unsuccessful men.

In trying to protect the women from nature, society has instead destroyed the women. We have created a society of hedonism and proliferation of low status (unsuccessful) culture. Look at one of the most popular recent movies in the USA (and note the piñata of ecstasy drugs at the end):

https://youtu.be/KJgJx05hR4M?t=128

Many of the successful men will be polygynous (i.e. fuck around), because that is the nature of man. If these men are conscientious then they will not use contraception and they will marry all the women they impregnate, as the Bible says to do[1]. The Bible is not against polygamy. It is a responsibility of a successful man to father children and maximize the successful procreation of the society. Nature designed it this way to incentivize men to be successful, work hard, and be responsible. This drives men to compete, because those men who are more hard working can have more wives. Those men who are lazy can masturbate to porn. The fathers of daughters (and elders) should teach those females that high status implies a man who can be responsible and has the means. In order to give these females their free choice, the society must not make it perfectly safe for the female to fuck Jeremy Meeks. When the State stops marrying females, then females will be much less likely on their own volition to choose bad boys who will leave them in the gutter. And fathers and elders must refuse to help those women who put themselves in the gutter. Otherwise, fathers and elders must decide who the females can fuck. Choose one. Obviously the gender roles can not be swapped, because women will not work hard to compete to possess and provide for multiple men and the offspring of those men (because for one reason she can not impregnate multiple men!).


The women can’t be expected to fix this, because women are not the organizers and long-term planners of civilization. This was the role of the tribal elders, but the Zionists (such as George Soros who fund the women’s marches, anthropogenic global warming lie, etc..) hate tribes. They want a globalized NWO wherein there is no diversity of villages (with elders) standing in the way of their aggregation of economies-of-scale (the dying industrial age paradigm). They inherently want to render the species non-resilient. Their model presumes that cooperation between tribes is a Coasian Theory of the Firm coordination problem which requires their management, yet I theorize this may be disintermediated by the arrival of the Inverse Commons.[2]


James A. Donald is correct that women can be very easily overcome by their hindbrain and make choices that maximize the drama and shit testing of men in order to find the “best man”:


But men are participating in this, so can we conclude only women have bad behavior, or rather that the root of the problem is an incorrect organization of society? Who would be to blame for that. I conclude men are to blame. Too many fucking dipshits who are unwilling to stand up and fight the Zionists and rather whine about women like bitches themselves or defect employing contraception and destroy themselves from an evolutionary perspective. IOW, those who cheer James A. Donald’s blog have the disease of the incapable:



P.S. The procreation strategy of highly educating female wives and daughters so as to reason with them to marry only successful/responsible males and to disavow divorce (such as within a religious sect), is a form of a tribe and in that way better than integrating with the decadent society. However, it probably suffers from the problem that highly educated females will insidiously (probably even subconsciously) pursue the elevation of hypergamy to surety via the collective society (e.g. finance their irrational hindbrain by empowering themselves via the State). Evident amongst Jewish sects and even the Scandinavians who are descendant from the highly competitive Vikings, that these groups trend towards leftism. Because the females of course subconsciously want hypergamy+safety (because they are not consciously driven to long-term plan the abstract organization of civilization). It is not quite clear to me why the males in these groups are blind to this and fall into this decadence. I am thinking perhaps they feel threatened by testosterone, brutality of nature, and they want a perfect “superrational” outcome. They are somehow fooled by their desire to elevate humanity so that humans can conquer biology and the nature of the Universe as I had explained is impossible in my prior post. Perhaps they are prioritizing what they perceive to be noble without really thinking out the long-term implications. A game theory model points to a conflict-of-interest between the desire of parents for more grandchildren and the disincentives for daughters to choose the mates who can provide the most:


The above makes a lot of sense. Parents spoil their daughters to insure offspring, but by doing so they finance their daugher’s irrational hypergamy hindbrain.

So wealth leads to a slide into leftism, because parents (and government) spoil their daughters trying to insulate them from nature. Thus causing the daughters to pursue their hindbrain instincts. Daughters then (subconsciously) fight (e.g. SJWs) to sustain privilege to finance the hedonism. This fight for privilege is obfuscated by some bullshit about equality, justice, and global village meshing with their Zionist propaganda thought leaders. This explains CoinCube’s observation that most Jews (given that most Jews are wealthy) are leftists. Their women want to be conquered by Nazis. Actually I had figured this out in my 20s, that in order to remain paternalistically masculine, men must defect from wealthy society.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/economic-decline-returning-marriage-to-historical-norms/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/learning-to-love/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/birth-rate-declines-with-higher-taxes-is-hollywood-to-blame-for-divorce/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/what-socialism-destroyed-govt-shutdown/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/history/americas-economic-history/socialism-has-destroyed-social-structure/

A corollary is that women are not (generally speaking) going to compete to produce the most innovation and profitable work because again, “the gender roles can not be swapped, because women will not work hard to compete to possess and provide for multiple men and the offspring of those men (because for one reason she can not impregnate multiple men!)”. Women will typically be motivated work to achieve societal goals such as more surety and safety (e.g. working in research to solve health care issues but not from profit driven perspective and in fact often they deplore the prioritization of a profit motive), not maximizing return-on-capital. Highly educating females merely empowers leftism. There is no other applicability really (really we do not need females for the innovation, we need to maximally motivate males in order to maximize innovation and production which means avoiding leftism). Please tell me it isn’t so. Most if not all intelligent man dream of having a wife who is his intellectual equal and best buddy. I gave up on trying to find a female mate who has male intellect. Who here has a female philosopher or writer they follow seriously for her insights? Simply does not exist. Do you need some convincing (and archived)?


[1] Matthew 19:6 “So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

Genesis 38:9-10 “…so whenever he slept with his brother’s wife, he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from providing offspring for his brother. What he did was wicked in the Lord’s sight; so the Lord put him to death also.”

[2] The Inverse Commons and my thesis about the rise of a meritocracy in the knowledge age and the decline of finance as mentioned in my prior post, is a response to the lie of the Enlightenment: