The POW miners get 60% of EACH block. ASIC = centralization (a fact proven by BTC Warehouse farms)
So everyone is ok now that 60% of each block is shared to less people. Wow great thinking going on here.
Does this make sense to anyone?
This issue is by far way more crucial than any of the other points you bring up.
THIS really should be your number 1 concern.
LET US GOD DAMN VOTE!!! Where is my/our stake power to vote about this stuff.
I fear the ASIC miner but my voting power isn't even considered...
--------------------------
ASICs can be developed for any code (just a matter of cost), but the code can be changed and forked.
Ah, didn't I read somewhere that Decred is all about embracing hard forks and voting them in or not?
--------------------------
BTW I am not even against ASICs, I actually embrace them. The solution can be a multi algorithm POW system.
See? Is it so difficult to understand this one aspect of decentralization?
So will it be DEcred or CEcred?
If you're a stakeholder in Decred, you should put forward your arguments on the the off-chain voting infrastructure when it's up and running (Politeia or Pi for short). It's blockchain-anchored and censorship-resistant, so you can be sure it'll be heard and the other stakeholders will be able to vote on the issue. That really is the best way to resolve disputes that aren't clear-cut. As mentioned in this thread, Politeia is currently undergoing rigorous development and testing.