You work to promote your opinion as the truth whilst the fact is, it is just an opinion only based on inference, just like mine is an opinion, also based on inference. Except I'm not saying mine is the truth I'm saying my point are more logical and make more sense!!

Firstly, yes, defrauding Swiss investors does get people many years in prison. If they were scammers why did they pick one of the most severe countries that does not tolerate investment scams - there are plenty of offshore places you can set up a company?

Secondly, why launch a security token - which will bring down the scrutiny of regulators on your company - seriously as a scammer you want to be under the radar - you would go with a crypto token only surely?

Thirdly, why bother with a well-written 56 page Whitepaper when a 10 page one will do? (The writing is sophisticated and complete)

Fourth, how do you get a prominent business man (Seif Shieshakly) with a reputable, established company that focuses on Lean Manufacturing techniques to vouch for capabilities to run an operation of this scale, if you are a scammer ?

Fifth, why claim a high ROI in first year, when a scammer would claim low ROI in first year and then higher ROI in second and third years ? Surely a scammer would claim low ROI of 20%, which you can pay from investor funds in the first year, whilst making off with the 80% whilst no one is the wiser. Why claim 161% when you know you're going to look like a scammer within 3 months if you dont start making serious earnings payments.

As scammers, they sure are crap at being scammers! OR they are what they say and it is your inferences that are wrong.

They've promised Letters of Intent and Notorised statement from a big4 auditor before the ICO starts. Lets wait for these to become available before deciding on what is the truth ??