A "statistic person" from New Delhi, eh? And a blind one, that is, or why would you need a 20pt font size to scribble down your "scientific" findings?

Seriously dude, you have to try harder than this. For starters, asking critical questions and revealing cheap marketing tricks has nothing to do with "attacking" anyone. Second, until now I haven't had the honor of someone analyzing my "writing style", so thank you very much. I guarantee you it's the kind of writing style you'd see more frequently if you were to make the effort of reading content outside your little shilling bubble. Third, utrust is the only ICO-like venture I have participated in so far - in fact, I did not participate in the ICO at all but only in the pre-ICO, as I said before. I have no clue about monetha nor would I have any interest in them after my appalling experience with utrust and its shills. I assume it's just how it goes with most ICOs. Forth, even though it's none of your business, I registered here in June in order to be able to contact a member from Kraken to accelerate my tier 2 verification. And fifth, had you read what I wrote you would have also known that my very first criticism (="attack" in your vocabulary) was expressed when utrust drastically changed their terms and applied them retrospectively months after the pre-ICO. It was too obvious to ignore, and what followed was a further research by others and myself that revealed all the things wrong with this company.