OK, so what is your definition of Bitcoin? Whatever the maintainers of the Core github repository jam down your throat?
Bitcoin is Bitcoin
Yes, but a tautology is not a definition.
I smiled reading this weird answer.
So what's your definition of Bitcoin, jbreher?
Please don't tell us your definition of Bitcoin is an Altcoin fork of it... that'd be mental imo
"Bcash is bitcoin."
https://i.imgflip.com/163xpj.jpgI don't know why you have quotes. Quotes imply that you are quoting someone. Who are you quoting? Certainly not me.
Hey mindrust - what definition do you adhere to for 'Bitcoin'?
User:
jbreherSimple. Bitcoin Cash is purely Bitcoin. Shitcoins be shitcoins. Not too hard, is it?
If Bitcoin Cash is not Bitcoin (a hypothetical with which I do not agree), then this forum -- the Announcements (Altcoins) Forum -- would be a place that the creators of bitcointalk specifically set aside for discussion thereof.
You stupid piece of shit.
I'm just much bullishier on Bitcoin Cash.
Why ?
I ask with no snark or ill-intention.
Because it is purely and simply Bitcoin. In the form that I believe Satoshi intended. After all, it is Bitcoin largely as he left it, but with the insane centrally-planned production quota on transaction capacity relieved.
Bitcoin Cash _is_ Bitcoin. It's history extends unbroken back the the genesis block.
