That article is irrelevant. You cannot know the exact type of memory installed on the GPU, but empirically.
I have 2 models from that list:
a Palit Dual GTX 1060 3GB, equipped with Samsung memory - about 20 MH/s stock, 23.8-24.6 MH/s overclocked (22.5 MH/s in the article)
a Gigabyte Windforce GTX 1060 3GB, equipped with Hynix memory - 15.5 MH/s stock, struggles to get to 19.1 MH/s overclocked (25.2 MH/s in the article, assuming it's Samsung memory - a great result)
Thanks for the feedback!
You can click on the GPU name to see all the hashrate records, and yes, the Gigabyte Windforce hash record was achieved with Samsung memory.
There is now an option just to compare by price:
https://www.pyramidreviews.com/cryptocorner/mining-gpu-speed-and-price-comparison/ethereum-mining-speed-gpu-comparison-for-gtx1060-3gb/?compare=priceWhat would make the comparison chart more useful?
I'm also toying with the ability to compare based on a hashrate that you could enter, or change, across all the cards so that you could see what was the best option available right now.