Tokenization is not really that revolutionary, as digitalization of assets in centralized manner has been done for years already. But what is revolutionary in cryptoeconomics is the fact that those systems are working completely without any central organ. Even economists from Austrian school didn't predict that there will ever be decentralized money - they were advocating for money issued by private parties. Bitcoin would also interest those who study game theory, because game theory lies in its foundation. Right now we see that some economists call Bitcoin a bubble because they've been living in a world of stocks and assets for their whole life, so they refuse to understand how Bitcoin can have any value if its not creating any profit. So, we'll definitely see some additions to economic theory that will study Bitcoin - the only question is if they would eventually get accepted into mainstream or not.