Thank you....in this case I can log in....and I have access to the associated recovery emaIl...thus if I'm not mistaken I have the same proof of ownership as anyone else on this forum...
I could be mistaken but that is my understanding?
Not really. The standard proof of ownership is thru signing a message. So, basically, if you provide other proof other than signing a message then most likely it will not be entertained especially if it takes a lot of time to verify whether it can be or not. Please read the sticky like KWH said. You obviously didn't read it.
Hello, I actually have read the sticky many times, for the last 2 years, but it specifically says it is for account recovery, does not address banned accounts, and does not ascertain standard proof of ownership.
I'm not saying you are wrong, but I have read the sticky and would not have made this request otherwise. I would gladly send a signed message but no PGP key was required on signin, and I responsibly maintained my ability to log in
Thank you
If so and you recognizing the possibility that the ban was due to being not able to log in to your account after the database hack and for security purposes it was banned (or locked) then it falls to recovering your account. Even though you can recover it via email, the case is that it was banned because of security puposes (a possibility) then it would be useless and end up providing proof of ownership.
P.S. Don't worry. I don't take it offensively.
P.P.S. Finished this post after BitRent had replied. I decided not to delete this. I think it would contribute to further understanding the situation.