Hi,
I'm mining since July 2017 with some GTX 1070 cars. All worked perfect.
Now I have for testing here a MSI GTX 1070 TI GAMING X card.
I testet it on
ethminer (latest version)
Claymore 10.2
with latest nvidia drivers.
https://imgur.com/a/QLL97
see image here: https://imgur.com/a/QLL97
before the black reported hasrate-line I mined with ethminer (often some high peaks but terrible low zero points) nanopool reportet 8MH/s.
After the first high peak hashrate dropped to zero than later the second peak, but why such immense huge difference???
Ethminer and Claymore allway reported absolutely constant ...32MH/s.
Later I tested with claymore. But also with claymore very low fall points.
I'm wondering what to do or is the claymore and ethiner -since yet- not optimized for gtx1070TI.
Ethminer reportet always hashrate between 32..33MH
with claymore always 32.8MH absolutely constant.
Why do the nanopool such a unstable hashrate-graph?
Afterburner
PWR 60percent
mem + 800 MHz
Core - 100 MHz
Temps are very low very good airflow about 42°C.
only one card @Z170 carbon mainboard.
Are there special tweaks for ethminer (working size cuda ??) or @claymore for optimizing gtx1070TI?
Do anybody can send me PM for contact ethminer-developer?
I'm mining since July 2017 with some GTX 1070 cars. All worked perfect.
Now I have for testing here a MSI GTX 1070 TI GAMING X card.
I testet it on
ethminer (latest version)
Claymore 10.2
with latest nvidia drivers.
https://imgur.com/a/QLL97
see image here: https://imgur.com/a/QLL97
before the black reported hasrate-line I mined with ethminer (often some high peaks but terrible low zero points) nanopool reportet 8MH/s.
After the first high peak hashrate dropped to zero than later the second peak, but why such immense huge difference???
Ethminer and Claymore allway reported absolutely constant ...32MH/s.
Later I tested with claymore. But also with claymore very low fall points.
I'm wondering what to do or is the claymore and ethiner -since yet- not optimized for gtx1070TI.
Ethminer reportet always hashrate between 32..33MH
with claymore always 32.8MH absolutely constant.
Why do the nanopool such a unstable hashrate-graph?
Afterburner
PWR 60percent
mem + 800 MHz
Core - 100 MHz
Temps are very low very good airflow about 42°C.
only one card @Z170 carbon mainboard.
Are there special tweaks for ethminer (working size cuda ??) or @claymore for optimizing gtx1070TI?
Do anybody can send me PM for contact ethminer-developer?