Epic bullshit. Instead of engaging in theology and semantics as would befit a zealot why don't you prove me wrong and answer the question I've asked about six times: "is Bitcoin scarce, and with regards to you answer what then would be the rational and likely response to that"
Weisoq, can you please stop spreading insults and stay on topic and clarify your critique?
It is not up to me to answer to hinsideous and confused questions ("is Bitcoin scarce?")
Rather it is up to you to point out what your critique is.
...
No I didnt think so. Pathetic.
In propagation of a belief structure or infrastructure it is for the believer to justify such belief to the sceptic, not the other way around. Whether my views on Bitcoin are that of atheism or agnosticism or adherence, such a sceptical starting point is that shared by those yet to take up the concept and therefore questions needs addressing (questions and views that friends and colleagues enquiring of Bitcoin and cryptos in general have, which is what makes this discussion particularly interesting).
I have to assume that your reference to an initial simple and fundamental question as insidious (rather than just answering it; and theres nothing confused about it whatsoever, scarcity is a prime factor in assessing the value of any asset) implies that you think the answer to that question will provide a means for you to begin outlining my critique for me. Which means were going nowhere, and so Im done with wasting my time on this discussion. Good luck.