You keep screaming there was a "vote". The vote barely passed (Not even close to 90%) but the vote was null and void anyway because it violated the terms and conditions of the coin "constitution". Now you're just mad that you didn't get rich and anyone that actually believes in this coin will agree that the coin should keep to it's original mission statement instead of bending to the will of people that just want to pump and dump. This is exactly how a proper decentralized coin should be, there are no "leaders". So it's irrelevant who proposed the "vote", it violated the original coin philosophy and was not administered.
Good proof. You essentially just showed everyone that after a main developer left and sold all of his coins, over a million, that the price has stabilized and is going back up and indicating strong support.... *Slow clap*
Not to mention the coin is literally single digit months old and has had one minor drawback while dozens of developers and community members have stepped up into the future development of the coin.
I'd say this coin is inspiring, if anything, and has a bright future.
The price has bottomed out and go up maybe %5 when a sucker buys the coin. then it falls right away.. Go look at the sell orders
And yes 90% of the owners of the coins voted to halve the coin. And look it didnt halve and the coin failed. One guy vetoed the majority vote that is a fact
The wallets are broke fact
The network is dyeing fact
One guy has the power to veto everything fact
The only people talking this coin up are the ones still trying to sell coins
I don't see anything wrong with keeping the fundamentals intact.
"Wallets are broken fact" - There are some issues, like with any system - but a little more often than we would like now because we're decentralizing the way it works. As far as I know its a first for this type of 'centralized' wallet system. (MyBitcoinZ is based on Copay which was written by Bitpay). The benefit of going through the growing pains to decentralize far outweigh not trying to decentralize. This is another quality of ensuring a long lived coin.
The network is dying - again no 'facts' or should I say evidence. Why do you continue with this? Is it because if you were to actually try and find cold hard evidence it would contradict your statement? The network is far from dead. As a matter of fact even without the mybitcoinz wallet system, there is still a CORE WALLET.
One guy has the power to veto 'everything' - the fundamentals and founding principles are not 'everything'. There is a degree of respect for a project that stays true its beginnings and carrying a vision of immutability.
Go on with your new coin already - thanks for your coins dump. What a coincidence there is a coin dump then you pop right in. Your conclusory statements can only manipulate so much before people start asking for the evidence to back them up.