Hi there 00,
Regarding your first question that is part of our IP that we are developing. As you have had explained to you before we have no intention of revealing details about our IP to anyone; you have accepted this before so please bear that in mind. Once we are ready to reveal these type of details (if ever) then they will be revealed via our usual channels which include this thread.
Regarding your second question that is answered by what you queried in your first question.
Regarding your third question that is also answered by what you queried in your first question.
So every answer reverts to "we can't tell you b/c it's closed-source". On a decentralized blockchain. Ironically noted.
Criticism is welcome. Your continued trolling is not. You make inaccurate statements (for example suggesting that we do not support BPL within BiT and myBlockpool - this is a direct lie) and expect to be taken seriously?
Shame on you for putting words in my mouth, Andrew. I suggested that the API you created for Bjork does not utilize the BPL blockchain in any fashion. Before you continue painting people as liars, let's talk about it.
Please explain the utility BPL, the token itself, has within your Bjork API deliverable. Were crypto payments on Bjork's website processed on Blockpool's blockchain? Audiocoin's blockchain? Or were they processed with a standalone proprietary API created by BPL devs, who are being paid full-time salaries on funds raised in BPL's token sale?
I could very well be wrong. Please prove me so.