Erik. Stop hiding.
You still have a plethora of issues to address and for too long you just draw them out crippling what credibility you have left to run a company.
Daily, you're allowing the pie to be cut away in larger and larger pieces. An objective fact is that there are many better sites than SD right now because SD has become too incompetent to keep up. https://twitter.com/PrimeDice/status/346728978129756160
The current plan of yours to withdraw what you claim is your btc from the pool and replace with your month of dividends should NOT be done, it is clearly still a contested matter. You cannot claim that it is unreasonable for shareholders to assume that a sum like that (a core piece of the site workings) is somehow separate from the business assets. With no indication of these belonging to anyone/anything BUT the business. This of course is a key piece of information in determining whether it's worth investing in.
A balance sheet of business assets is needed (and will likely also cause some contest with the current trend of your calculations)
Many costs from previous months also have not been explicitly clarified. (over a month of waiting too get a proper answer relating to these)... These phantom costs suggest foul play by you... If you are innocent, you should be happy to outline the true nature of these, your continual absence of response does not help.
You really should be more present here or hire somebody who is competent at filling a PR role. Was the last one a joke?
You still have a plethora of issues to address and for too long you just draw them out crippling what credibility you have left to run a company.
Daily, you're allowing the pie to be cut away in larger and larger pieces. An objective fact is that there are many better sites than SD right now because SD has become too incompetent to keep up. https://twitter.com/PrimeDice/status/346728978129756160
The current plan of yours to withdraw what you claim is your btc from the pool and replace with your month of dividends should NOT be done, it is clearly still a contested matter. You cannot claim that it is unreasonable for shareholders to assume that a sum like that (a core piece of the site workings) is somehow separate from the business assets. With no indication of these belonging to anyone/anything BUT the business. This of course is a key piece of information in determining whether it's worth investing in.
A balance sheet of business assets is needed (and will likely also cause some contest with the current trend of your calculations)
Many costs from previous months also have not been explicitly clarified. (over a month of waiting too get a proper answer relating to these)... These phantom costs suggest foul play by you... If you are innocent, you should be happy to outline the true nature of these, your continual absence of response does not help.
You really should be more present here or hire somebody who is competent at filling a PR role. Was the last one a joke?
What's with all of the FUD? If you don't trust Erik, don't buy shares of SDICE. Sell them so that I can buy them 
It's not FUD, most everything that people are saying is based on empirical fact. I don't even need to own shares to wish that Erik would conduct his business with even some level of integrity and professionalism... The more stories we get of corruption and incompetence, the worse it is for everyone in the Bitcoin community. Bitcoin is something greater than greed, and it's something we shouldn't be let compromised by others.