Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: ICO SPAMMER LIST EXPOSED --> PRANK TURNS OUT WELL
by
AT101ET
on 30/11/2017, 09:35:26 UTC
With all due respect, I did say that I would only post fairly and honestly. I would never actively promote an ICO I didn't believe in in one way or another.
I've read your PM after someone pointed it out. The first thing that came into mind is: Protection in case that you got caught. Think about it rationally. If you were to post honestly, who in their right mind would hire you to post in their thread if you started posting negatively (if that was your honesty)? Nobody.

But yes, I shouldn't have been greedy. I guess the BTC price has clouded my vision...
Nobody with that high trust rating should be PM-ing these services in any case. Was your trust rating 0, I would have possibly let it go (given the way the PM was written).

What do you mean by protection? I didn’t begin to think about “getting caught” as despite it not being the straightest thing to do I knew that I’d only pen honest posts.
There was no information about the ICO.
Had I know that it would have been a project with no substance to it then posting on the thread would have been pointless. It wouldn’t have been worth my time or right of me. It’s not something I believe in.
What good is there in promoting an ICO which has no future? (hence my specific terms). The only ICO ANN threads that I’ve participated in are ones that I have an interest in, genuine questions about it just a general interest.
I thought I could get paid to do something I’d have done naturally - that was greedy of me and I accept that.
I guess you don’t know me and hiding behind a computer screen doesn’t add anything in my favour. Should you ever find yourself in London, I’d be happy to buy you a coffee and show you who I am as a person.
I think you’d know that my intent was never malicious and that what I said in my PM was  reflective of my true values.
We could discuss this back and forth but I just see it ending up with your word against mine with no real way of either of us being able to prove my intensions.
Thanks anyway.