Hey VP, thanks for the update

- but I (personally) don't agree this the logic here...
The coinswap represents a highly valuable opportunity to move away from the slow, bloated and somewhat broken blockchain CBX currently implements - to update the client with modern (SECURE) code base and set CBX on a firm footing for the future should be the primary goal here. Just because a single (granted our only) exchange won't support the coin if we swap should not (ever) dictate the technical direction of the implementation of the coin - the code/blockchain at the end of the day is all that matters, and if it's not sound CBX has no future.
With a coinswap, new code base, clean client and fluid blockchain (you can sync from the Gen block to the latest) we should re-approach a number of key exchanges and diversify our market penetration. What if our only exchange implodes in 3 months time?
Just my two sense, but if we bend to the will of a singular corporate entity that is in this game to solely make money what does that say about CBX, it's values and the attitudes toward decentralisation that any investor will questionnaire before placing buy orders that will drive it's value upward.
FR
I really want to disagree with this. But you make some valid points. The only drawbacks are the costs associated with getting listed on other exchanges, and having no real exchanges right at a time when we need them the most. However the flip side to this is possibly implementing a p2p exchange within the wallet. I know that would add development time though. Would be pretty cool if that were possible.