But there is any specific reasons of why they are "transmitting money" in the document? Can't read it all now.
No, there is no specific allegation in the document, just a general admonishment against violating the statute. California clearly has their wires crossed because, even under the most expansive interpretation of the law, the foundation is not a money transmitter.
They cannot be a money transmitter simply for advocating for Bitcoin as there are first amendment issues preventing regulation of that type of speech.
The point here is: They are a conglomerate of mtgox, bitpay and others which do fit the term money transmitter.