No, actually you are probably lying. In fact you seem to be making up how you're getting an R of .99.
Again, I'm asking you to show your work...but instead you seem to be dodging the point.
LOL YOU choose the confidence level. The higher it is, the more meaningful your conclusion are.
Oh so *that's* what you're blathering about. That's not exactly the case. For example if your sample size is fixed (like it is here). Choosing the CL alters your CI. If you make your CL 'better' the CI becomes wider. Now if, for example you haven't done your experiment yet and you are fixing your CI and your CL. Your sample size changes. It's a rookie mistake the kind I'd expect a non-math person to do. "Meaningful" is also a kind of ambiguous word it's something a frequentist would say.
So again, so what dataset are you using here?