All Patriarchy, which is the collectivist opposite of the non-collectivist Anarchy.
Patriarchal, federalist chiefdoms are not stateless.
I wholely reject your absurd distortion of the terms in use.
But even then, I can lay one down for you...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IroquoisYes they were a matrilineal society (and a matriarchial one, IMHO) and yes they did trade internally and externally.
They were stateless, both by the true defintion of the term, and your's as well.
Each expression of
archy is by definition the opposite of
Anarchy. That's an 'absurd' definition to collectivists, I know that.
"After becoming
united in the League, the Iroquois invaded the Ohio River Valley in present-day Kentucky to seek additional hunting grounds."
Being
united means being
collectivised, governed.