Re: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion
If were talking about outright calling AMC a scam literally in every sentence in a post, or abusive text, then yes please remove them all. I come home to 4 more pages of text in the thread, and half of it is people arguing or the same bashing. I really like what some dissidents have to say, especially when they offer a solution they think would be better for the company. This would in turn be better received by ken, and we can actually move on. SO DONT REMOVE NEGATIVE COMMENTS ABOUT AMC, but do moderate them for insanely ridiculous posts that do nothing but spread mindless FUD.
Like this post (despite the word scam being used, its not outright calling it that, and brings up real issues that is concise and easy to follow):
This is the kind of post that needs to get removed from the thread - so I will vote Yes to removing completely irrelevant posts not related to AMC
EDIT: I am concerned though, that Ken has time to put up a Poll, but ignores the geniune questions that NEED answers. There are reasons the shares have tanked, and one reason is because of the silence. I am a shareholder, and I am not a weak hand, yet I too am getting increasingly worried.
Sorry, I do feel a little bad about that entry. I guess I got a little carried away.
I am fine with having a mod, Burnside or even Ken remove off-topic posts.
I do however still consider there to be a vast amount of issues that need to be addressed before I can call AMC anything else then a "pretty damn close to a complete scam" based on a lot of the things brought up here. Starting with but not exclusively related to:
- pricing structure and expected profit margin
- ownership structure
- share structure
- ownership structure relating to profit and risk sharing related to VMC'S/AMC and Ken.
- listing practices and total share amount, listing time and dividend placement
Like this post (despite the word scam being used, its not outright calling it that, and brings up real issues that is concise and easy to follow):
I don't always spot 13 year olds, but when I do:
- they back out when anyone calls their bluff
- they have EVERY post in the same thread
-
- go home kid.
- they back out when anyone calls their bluff
- they have EVERY post in the same thread
-
- go home kid.
This is the kind of post that needs to get removed from the thread - so I will vote Yes to removing completely irrelevant posts not related to AMC
EDIT: I am concerned though, that Ken has time to put up a Poll, but ignores the geniune questions that NEED answers. There are reasons the shares have tanked, and one reason is because of the silence. I am a shareholder, and I am not a weak hand, yet I too am getting increasingly worried.
Sorry, I do feel a little bad about that entry. I guess I got a little carried away.
I am fine with having a mod, Burnside or even Ken remove off-topic posts.
I do however still consider there to be a vast amount of issues that need to be addressed before I can call AMC anything else then a "pretty damn close to a complete scam" based on a lot of the things brought up here. Starting with but not exclusively related to:
- pricing structure and expected profit margin
- ownership structure
- share structure
- ownership structure relating to profit and risk sharing related to VMC'S/AMC and Ken.
- listing practices and total share amount, listing time and dividend placement