Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Looking for thread URLs suspected of signature abuse
by
Lauda
on 12/12/2017, 08:53:15 UTC
I did say I haven't seen any evidence of anything relating to your campaigns, but I always listen. If baboons could speak a language I understood, I'd listen to them too, and it would probably be a fascinating conversation. But it doesn't mean I'm going to agree or support everything they may say.

QS, like a lot of people on this forum, seem to have their motives which can sometimes be unclear. I try my best to not support the motives that I do not agree with, but I don't generally like to just ignore things.
You do realize that what you're doing, and what I've been doing over the past year, is directly harming QS's business, right? Therefore, rationally it absolutely makes no sense to listen to him unless you like wasting your time on basement pests. In case of the later, you aren't exactly a rational person and should considering reading a book or visiting a course. There's only so much time that you will ever have.

Based on the blatant lies and false accusations, my first account is not eligible to join signature campaigns and I also need to make some money to pay my monthly living expenses. The false accusations forced me to create other accounts, otherwise I will be on the street soon.
If you are surviving by spamming sig. campaigns, you're an idiot who deserves to be permanently banned from here.

We are not abusing the campaign, we are using the same wallet to avoid paying higher fees on sending BTC to our fiat wallet. The accounts are being handled by different people and we are on one computer shop, I know this may not be common in some 1st world countries but in ours computer shops or cafes are abundant and reason why we are using one wallet is to avoid having different transaction fees in sending the bitcoins. I never thought that this would caused the accounts of having a negative feedback in the future. I am really sorry for that.
Yeah..no.