good point,
although i would be more interested in the project if it had a REAL commit history.
couldn't he just push to github once it's done?
another point -
the code is very concise - this is a good thing, not a bad one .
but it makes me wonder - so little code for a functional coin ?
The project was launched on November 15. This does not include the transport layer - it is a well-tested program for 2 years. So little code - yes, everything is simplified as much as possible. Of course, it will not work if there are many hosts or a lot of transactions, but this is due to imperfect transport layer. The history of the initial commits is there, but it is integrated into my private home repository. I can publish the output of git log from which the contact information was deleted.
You don't think your code will scale well to a lot of transactions and nodes/hosts? What will you do if this coin becomes popular?
Also, I agree you should change the name, you can't have a coin with the word "Cheat", it will not appeal to english-speaking audiences.
It seems like you have good talent in developing this, wish you luck.