And it has worked wonders...
Have you checked the altcoin section now? I can't even read the titles correctly nowadays.
Making the thread visible will just make the others doing the same and in the end we won't be able to distinguish words from rainbow eating bears and dancing unicorns ....
And there will be, trust me

You might be right he could come here from the altcoin section. Those shitcoins are going down, time to troll the shit out of those stupid BTC holders who think they know better!

Actually for the first time he might be close to reality. Of course a twisted reality but still
He probably followed the info on this:
https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html90% of all addresses have a balance lower than 0.1
Of course addresses/wallets/persons are different things but in the end there could only be at maximum 210 million people holding 0.1
Even if we include satoshi's coins and other that still means 3% of the population.
Not really. The difference between him saying that 90% of bitcoin holders have less than 0.1BTC each and referring the same to the population.
First of all the exact number of Bitcoin holders isn't known, and since one person can have thousands of addresses there's no data to hold on to. He's trying his best to build a whole theory an a made up fact and he knows it.
Perhaps I have explained the fees slightly wrong. But every source you read will say that bitcoin mining costs are going up.
So is the value of BTC. A completely normal thing in economy. If the bread cost $1 to make and is being sold by $2 and suddenly somebody pays you $10 for it it's natural that more people will want to make bread and the competition will increase making the resources (flour) more wanted and valuable, thus increasing their prices.
Haha I love how you tried to say one of my claims was baseless. And someone on your own FUD team instantly proved you wrong, LOL
Where did that happen? My team? I have made 1 post in this thread and I don't have a team, although if any of you guys want to cheer for me I'll be happy to oblige

Btw, could you at least point the person you're referring to. So many people have disagreed with you in this thread that it's getting hard to see who the target of the rebuttal is.