Hi Louda are you voice of ibminer?
I'm the voice of the animal who is reviewing all these reports (by ibminers and others), and the one who is going to tag you next.
I respectfully asked the explanation why you are so arrogant anyway what you answered is not the answer for my question "why not all the accounts having the negative trust?" What ever it is rule should be equal to all.
It would be
very wrong to treat everyone and every case equally, and by equally I mean that they are handled equally. Other than the classic abusers, most connections are very unique and while someone might deserve a negative rating right away for doing something, someone else might not for the same thing.[1]
[1] e.g. Offering escrow services. Someone without a trading history might get negged right away, while someone with one would probably not.