assumptions which cannot be proven -- can be expressed as mathematical equations. And that means they can be proven.
You just assume all equations can be proven. I agree that assumption cannot be proven.
Therefore your conclusion that a god exists is just an assumption.
Bravo! An A+ in political science for you. More and more political science from you is all we need. The more you blab, the more you show that you are stupidity's excuse for existence.
All your proof is circular reasoning that when applied to something else can prove something else.
Most of your talk is political science blabbing, since you can't use any factual science to show that cause and effect, entropy, and complexity don't prove the existence of God.
The factual science that doesn't say everything has a cause? In what science does it say that everything has a cause?
All science shows it. It doesn't have to be said. The greater the scientist, the more he/she uses cause and effect.