Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion
by
fdahq
on 05/07/2013, 05:16:48 UTC
I agree with you, this is not a good thing, just to make things more complicated. You need to know: Your remarks and any one wrong decision will cause the stock price fell, which we support your people is a bad luck. I suggest you integrate together. Do not split into three companies, and it's really annoying!
I don't think that is going to happen, AMC will continue to exist for a long time to come.  Even if the 10M shares where all swapped for VMC shares, AMC still has more to offer and will continue to grow.  The only difference will be that some of the revenue from AMC will flow into VMC.  I think it is a win for AMC and a win for VMC.  

Ken, from the bolded points above, it is clear that you have mixed up what was supposed to happen ... what everyone was asking for.

AMC and VMC was supposed to be merged ... so that there is only ONE entity.

Now, you are completely changing this around so that both will still exist, and AMC will grow ??

This is completely wrong! and will bring us right back to all the issues and dramas of the last 130 pages of this thread.

You need to merge AMC into VMC, with the express intention of COMPLETELY dropping AMC from existence.

Sure, it will take sometime for all AMC shares to be swapped over, but no one is going to hold on to AMC shares on purpose when they know AMC is being closed/merged into VMC.

If you don't do this, and FIX what you have been saying for the past few pages, then we are right back where we started. Two companies, and a lot of crap in between.

Please fix it, and stop confusing/mixing sh!t up.

Introduction
ActiveMining (AM) is a virtual identity totally held by the owner(s) of the Active Mining Corporation.

So ... instead of simplifying things and moving from 2 companies to 1 - you introduce a 3rd one.

So now, 3 companies!  Huh

Ken, seriously mate, you need to think things through properly, or find someone to do it for you.

Shareholders/investors are asking for ONE company, and you keep complicating things.

This does not bode well.