Re: [ANN][CRW] CROWN (SHA256) | Atomic | Governance | Systemnodes | Masternodes |
Thank you for the update.
Thought in progress, but how about enabling MasterNode/SystemNode operators to allocate a % of their revenues directly to certain projects? This might function as a kind of extension on the superblock process. MNs could vote on the validity of a series of causes, ensuring they were legitimate, had a solid team, etc - a collective KYC process. Then addresses/ids for approved projects would be displayed in the client. A configurable % of revenues could be sent on to these. That could be done manually, of course, but could also be organised at the protocol level.
- In the meantime I am working to figure out how to use Crown to help the funding of a water pump infrastructure in one village in Tanzania, something a friend of mine is working on since he visited the village this summer. The use of Crown to help foundations must be a key feature of Crown
Thought in progress, but how about enabling MasterNode/SystemNode operators to allocate a % of their revenues directly to certain projects? This might function as a kind of extension on the superblock process. MNs could vote on the validity of a series of causes, ensuring they were legitimate, had a solid team, etc - a collective KYC process. Then addresses/ids for approved projects would be displayed in the client. A configurable % of revenues could be sent on to these. That could be done manually, of course, but could also be organised at the protocol level.
That seems like a cool idea we should think about! Could you post it as a new topic here as well?
We're trying to organize ideas a bit better and less transient on the new forum.crown.tech