How does it feel to know that the whole Bcash one trick pony can loose most of its market cap the second Core feels that the benefit of raising the blocksize to 2mb outweighs the risk? That's their worst case scenario, and by the time 2mb is spammed to hell and people start bitchin' again LN should be right around the corner.
It is that fear that keeps me from shifting more of my BTC holdings to BCH.
I believe that if BTC cannot raise the block size limit in the medium-term (3 - 12 months) then BCH will fully take its place as the dominant crypto.
However, if BTC is able to raise the block size limit, I could see BCH dying. But I think the political machine that BS/Core built to prevent the block size limit from being lifted will come back to bite them. Why won't all the same arguments against a block size limit be used again? If BTC tries to increase the limit, will this result in yet another fork and another form of Bitcoin (e.g., will this next fork have replay protection or not)? Will that really work? Or will people just decide that BCH is the solution for lower fees and more reliable confirmation times?