Im sure this was said earlier and I may have just missed it, and maybe even discussed at length elsewhere, but I challenge the use of May as in use of this firmware may void your warranty.
It should be simply stated that use of this firmware voids your warranty.
Are people sending back individual boards for repair, and are able to not talk abou the firmware change, or are people reverting back to stock before their RMA claims and Bitmain cant detect that the MHz had been changed (or the that the firmware had be rewritten?) Or am I way off and the people that use this firmware just accept the loss of failed hardware replacement rights when their hardware inevitably fails, because this firmware is so advantageous? Thanks.
1. Bitmain say when you overclock you loose your warranty, so reduce the frequency is not the Problem.
2. When you change the Firmware you loose the warrenty, but the Firmware is on the Controller board not on the hashboards. and I think when you change back to the Orig. Firmware Bitmain can not see that you have change it before.