Well you said that all the scientific evidence for evolution would fit better for creation so why don't we have a creation theory if what you said it's true?
If there isn't any creation theory, it's because no scientist made one up, yet. We both know that the body of science writing is so great, that we don't know that there isn't any creation theory.
Yet you believe they made a hoax one but the one that's real, has no scientific theory? Makes sense to me
Didn't I just say that there isn't any creation theory that we know of? Can't you read?
''that we know of'' What you mean, that we know of. There isn't one because there is not even 1 single piece of evidence for it lmao.
There is lots of evidence for it. It's just that the financial powers that be have gone the route of not being interested in someone developing on. But if it has been developed, it simply has not been advertised.