You obviously know jack shit about networking/WAN or computers for that matter by basing anything off of a user's home internet speed.
You are obviously an idiot.
And have little understanding of the fact the majority of the internet speed is still running off of copper.
The Potential of Fiber Optics :
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/10/nokia-terabits-per-second-cable-speed-record/Another cable, Marea, being laid between the US and Spain, will carry 160Tbps over 16 fibres (10Tbps per fibre) when it's inaugurated sometime in 2017-2018.
If Marea upped its per-fibre speed to 65Tbps its total capacity would be around 520Tbps, or 65 terabytes per second.
That would let you transfer about 16,250 4GB Blu-ray rips per second.
And the Fact Moore's Law still exists.
Shows you are clueless of the tech available.
╥Aztek
Again, you don't know shit. Read up about routing protocols, WAN circuits, back bones, LECs and Colocation. Also try transferring large files across your home network or multiple hard drives if you have them on your PC. Read up on HD seek time, FSB, L2 cache and the like and then come back at me with your idiotic formulas above.
There's nothing close to wire speed even on a LAN, let alone WAN.
You're an idiot that probably claim 1MB was too much.