Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
I'm all for a block size increase to 2mb. I just think that 8mb, as proposed by BCash, is too much, and will create more problems in the future, such as centralized nodes.
I agree... start slow and move up.
Just do something.
Amazing how people can't see the obvious. 2MB blocks, 8MB, 64MB, whatever you want MB is not the solution. And 8MB blocks by BCash has low fees for simple reason absolutely nobody is using it.
That second part is not true.
I take Roger at his word that he is using Bcash, especially to provide demonstrations about how great Bcash is. Jihan is using Bcash, along with forcing anyone purchasing miners from him to do so through Bcash, there are also people moving Bcash to sell it, and there are also probably a few retards that actually believe bcash is bitcoin 2.0 who are buying it....
hahahahaha.
O.k... I 'm quibbling. I'm quibbling.
Tldr.. roger is not nobody... you better give some respect.
You can put whatever cap you want sooner or latter fees are going to again get up as adoption spreads, and we are not even at the beginning of real adoption, meaning adoption at the Twitter or Facebook users number levels. Block size increase will only lead to many people not being able to run a node and solve nothing. The only solution is LN, true solution without any side effects. Unlimited number of transactions, 0 fees, period. There is no point of making Bitcoin more centralized when LN are just around a corner. Let's first try and see how it works before we hard-fork to bigger block-size forever.
Exactly. 1) why "fix" something that is not broken, 2) the stupid-ass suggested fix is likely to make matters worse, 3) bitcoin has a lot of uses cases already, and 4) developments such as lightning network are being worked on and tested and likely to be adopted and implemented more and more and more, and resolve a lot of the temporary issues that are supposedly causing BIG blocker nutjobs to get their panties in a twist...
By the way, the BIG blocker nutjobs really don't give a ratt's ass about fixing bitcoin, they merely want to change its governance, make it more easy to change and some other bullshit nonsense that would pretty much destroy the various current value propositions of bitcoin. Making bitcoin difficult to change is a feature and not a bug, because we don't want stupid ass astroturfs coming in and acting like they are changing bitcoin to make it better, when bitcoin is not broke. Those misinformation spreading fucktards.
