Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: Improving confirmation time
by
achow101
on 27/12/2017, 02:29:05 UTC
⭐ Merited by ETFbitcoin (2)
So if you don’t like the term mempool, how about unconfirmed transaction pool, as long as you know what I’m talking about. I understand the transactions are not received at the same time by all nodes and miners, that’s why I brought up as a requirement that the content of the next block has to be agreed upon early enough. And no, the blockchain still has its value since the content is only then secured with the proof-of-work requirement.
How do you have all nodes agree on the contents of the next block? Don't just say "somehow", provide exactly how you think they would be able to do this. Furthermore, this does in fact allow for the blockchain to be done away with. The Proof of Work is how Bitcoin determines the transaction order and determines who is correct. Having some other method of determining the transaction order thus does not need the Bitcoin blockchain (note that this does not mean it can't use PoW or have PoW somewhere as part of it).