Product contains devfee 1% (0.5% for me, 0.5% for alexkap) and is close-sourced, but voluntary work won't be abandoned.
Will be distributed (at least on the first stage) as one binary per algo, not so convenient, I understand, but currently it's code-bounded.
Cool work - however please consider this a formal request for the source - is seems the kernels might be related to another project of yours,
https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer - which I'd also love the source for. Since the ccminer fork is entirely off a project released under GPL, all the code you've written is also considered GPL.
I'm all for your devfee and am not looking to remove it, however I tend not to run anything I cannot compile myself and I tend to try and do my own optimizations for my linux rigs.
Thanks - looking forward to the releases.
I will second this motion; ccminer is GPL and you (palgin & alexkap) no doubt have code from ccminer embedded in your code, therefore violating GPL license agreements. Doesn't matter if it's 30% or 0.03%.
I'm sorry about your financial situation (if true), but that doesn't allow you to do what you are doing here. Besides, your miner isn't any better than ccminer on neoscrypt, likely because of windows well-known DWM encumberances.
Please release the open source, as is expected.