Correct me if i am wrong:
$36,000,000 x 2% = $720,000 x 25% = $180,000
$180,000 is the total budget for the signature campaign, so it means that if there are 25 new participants everyday, there would be 425 new participants between today (Dec 29th to January 14th) So it will be 425 + 778 (actual participants) = 1203 participants in total (this is not accurate, just math)
So it would mean that the budget of $180,000 would be distributed between those 1203 participants, okay.
This bounty pays per post, if we consider that each one of the participants who are in the spreadsheet make 120 posts during the whole campaign, the math would be like this:
120 x 1203 = 144360 posts in total.
So lets think that every participant enter this campaign being a full member, he will get 4 stakes per post, but if at the end of the campaign he is Sr Member, he will get five per post.
It means that if we consider that those 144,360 posts are distributed as if everybody was a Sr Member (as an average, because most users joined being Members - Full Members)
It would be like this; 144,360 x 5 = 721,800 STAKES in total.
And the final calculation would be like this; $180,000 / 721,800 = $0,25 per total stake.
If you did 120 posts during the whole campaign and if you end up being a Sr Member at least, you will only receive 120 x 5 = 600 stakes = $150 for the whole period.
Correct me if i am wrong, but FOR ME, this is the lowest paying campaign and everybody is joining like crazy in here, and there are more than 25 new users a day.
Remember that those are only maths, i do not want to scare anyone or just spread fud in here.
I agree. The participants here are reaching extremely high numbers. And because there is no limit then the people here are joining the craze as if this is the only campaign that pays enough. Well, at the end of the day, this might not even be paying enough because of the incredibly huge number of participants. I prefer a stake which is per week rather than per post. It invites, even encourages, spamming. And spams are irrelevant posts. And, yes, there should be a certain limit to campaign participation.
Don't get me wrong. I am a solid supporter of Envion!
Thank you for your concern and input. Your math is correct, but you average everything out and that removes the purpose of post counts and different stake counts.
Not every participant is eligible for the bounty. First everybody goes trough verification process and some of the users don't meet our criteria, so they are not eligible for the bounty. Not every user has same rank, it varies greatly. And most important of all, not all users post regularly! This means that users with high rank and regular posts will receive much greater reward then the user who joined on the last week of campaign. Even if we get 25 new users every day, their activity will be significantly lower because the didn't have head start like some of the users from the beginning. At the end of campaign we will go trough every submission for every user and rewards will be distributed equally to the amount of work done.