Well simply and precisely, how you praised BCH I know it has these qualities of huge block size and blah blah blah but here we come to a genuine issue which is BCH is not distinctive. We have more than around 1300 alts look into them you will find even better options than BCH and then shift your funds as well, all the dump heads are doing it. 
I won't say BTC don't have issues yes it has that need to be fixed. Personally I have no issues with transaction confirmation but for me fee is a big issue. Transactions are delayed because people don't pay the proper fee to be on a priority base and that's it. I trade on binance, bittrex, local bitcoin exchanges my transaction never stucked.
Now the one and only reason why I like bitcoin? Because it's the pioneer and it's not been imposed on anyone to like it. People love it because it has proved itself on every forum anytime everywhere.
I won't say BTC don't have issues yes it has that need to be fixed. Personally I have no issues with transaction confirmation but for me fee is a big issue. Transactions are delayed because people don't pay the proper fee to be on a priority base and that's it. I trade on binance, bittrex, local bitcoin exchanges my transaction never stucked.
Now the one and only reason why I like bitcoin? Because it's the pioneer and it's not been imposed on anyone to like it. People love it because it has proved itself on every forum anytime everywhere.
I know that there are perhaps more valiable options to invest in than BCH, hell even BTC, but im not trying to point that out here. BTC is pioneer, I agree, there is a reason why everything besides him is called altcoin. BCH is not the first and only coin forked out of BTC, I get that also, but as I said before, facts tell me BCH is more truer to original Satoshi vision than BTC is right now-BCH developed because of that in the first place, and facts support that. Thats the reason why imo its pointless to look at BCH as some shitcoin trying to take BTCs place.
The point is, both have their problems, but rn BTC is banged up and in really bad shape, and BCH is holding much better, price aside, look at the foundations what bitcoin is and what it can be. Satoshi wanted bigger block sizes, BCH wanted it, and it has it, BTC think differently, obviously. There is actually some sense when its said that "Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin", taking these facts above.... In other words, they are "fighting" to be true leader what bitcoin is in the first place.
As you said, the one and only reason why you love BTC so much is because its pioneer and its proven etc. But if you know BTC has its serious problems and agree that BCH is maybe technically better solved to deal with these problems and its truer to "real Bitcoin", why still stick so firmly to it? Is it good enough to be pioneer and not being imposed on anyone to like it enough when the problems are much more serious and seems like its more or less stay that way?
Again, im not pro any of these, I would like to invest in both, just I want to clear some question marks I have behind understanding logic people like any/both of them so much, and why....
Curkowski people are giving you legitimate answers, and you are saying "you are getting it", and even volunteering some explanations on your own, but then you end up asking the same questions over and over again, which leads me to think you are either not really getting it or you just like to write repetitive text walls...
1) BCH is an altcoin, there are many other altcoins out there which can be argued to be more pragmatic and even more "in the spirit of Satoshi whitepaper", etc. so none of these can count as a valid argument to why BCH should take over...
2) If BCH had similar popularity as Bitcoin, it would undeniably face similar problems with network clogging, transaction costs, etc. Meanwhile it can be argued that it already is more centralized than Bitcoin, and even at its inception BCH was a very problematic and biased fork which many people vehemently opposed and are opposing to this day. It would be a bit ridiculous to assume that a coin that divided the community on such sharp lines from the get go can smoothly go on to become number 1, or that any of the advantages it appears to have over BTC can not be replicated or improved upon by other much better contenders, and probably by even BTC itself down the line.
Now I sincerely hope you don't respond by "getting it" and then repeating the same trite questions again & again...