The bitcoin code base / protocol was complete years ago and needed no other genius proof of dev any more like E=mc^2 does not need to be bubbled up by other fellows any more.
And thus, you show your ignorance of physics, too. E=mc^2 is the equation for the
rest energy of matter. Got velocity? A more complicated equation is required to ascertain E.
What else would I expect from somebody with the abject technical incompetence requisite for belief in a linear scaling solution to an exponential scaling problem? Even a five-year-old can understand the difference between big and huge.
Im sorry that the universe is not oversimplified to fit your childish expectations. No, waitI am not sorry, after all.
Well, if (
if) BCH ever gets sufficiently popular for its 8MB blocks to persistently fill, enjoy your skyrocketing fees and backed-up mempool on your centralized pseudocoin with 1/1000 the tx throughput of Visaas Lightning scales up to compete with the big boys.
People like Roger Ver is brainwashing new individuals like you into thinking that lightning network = centralization. It's their own altcoin which is = centralization since miners have the power to control the block sizes in their bcash crap coin.
Ver accuses others of his own worst sins. When enforced through repetition, thats an effective propaganda technique for corralling the weak and the stupid. But BCHs supporters even admit to their anti-node/miner-supremacy agenda; what they want is not decentralization, but decentraliztion enough [
sic]:
BCH: mining nodes = full nodes
If 'the world' is mining this is decentraliztion enough.
Non - mining nodes are not needed for small hodlers.
Get it or stay on BTC.