2017.12.14: 0.00015274 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.15: 0.00016215 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.16: 0.00015657 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.17: 0.00014935 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.18: 0.00015026 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.19: 0.00014398 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.20: 0.00012560 - 34% Antpool / 33% F2Pool / 33% Slush
2017.12.21: 0.00013179 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.22: 0.00013496 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.23: 0.00012280 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.24: 0.00012809 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.25: 0.00012465 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.26: 0.00012443 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.27: 0.00012870 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.28: 0.00013183 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.29: 0.00013153 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.30: 0.00013900 - 100% Antpool
2017.12.31: 0.00014293 - 100% Antpool

I wanted to change to slush based on the transaction fees being shared among the miners and antpool having too much "weight" in the faith system but realized we don't know enough details about HF as to what pay structure within slush that it chooses to use, (might also not pay transaction fees).  Also I think someone mentioned it already but I also recall reading on the HF website that the daily payout is also based on some kind of averaging system across all of it's users mining operations but clearly that's not the case otherwise one would expect our daily per TH/s metrics to be the same across the board.  The fact that they are very close is reassuring to say the least from one perspective, just still really curious about the extra profits from the blockchain saturation.