I don't understand why the max bet should go down. I see some are surprised of the amount of loss that can be made in a short time. Indeed the site lost in a few days roughly 4,000 btc on an invested capital of around 25,000 btc, that's a loss of -16%. But if it can go down so much so quick, it can also go up so much so quick, which indeed happened right before when the site was up 2000 btc or +6% in only a few days too. As long as you have the 1% house advantage all is well I would think as you have statistical certainty that you will make up the loss
as long as people continue to play.
However is it not the case that lowering the maximum bet makes the site less attractive for whales? If yes, you risk indeed not making up the loss if the whales choose other destinations!
I am stunned that just-dice succeeded in having MORE turnover than Satoshi Dice already after 1 month. BTC turnover being the most important factor for the bottom line that is an amazing accomplishment. Obviously just-dice is offering value. Is it offering too much value and asking too little in return resulting in a loss? I think that is too early to judge as a monthly loss of say -5% can still be made up easily the next month with say +15%, resulting in an average of +5% per month, as was 'promised' in the brochure
You should be able to bet whatever you want, even more than the investor's money.
But if you want to bet something huge (let's say 10k USD), it should split the bets into smaller ones, and ran them independantly.
That won't stop whales from coming, and will be safer for investors.
The volatility is too much for investors and a run of "bad luck" will scare off investors and ruin the site. The fact is the whales are going to go nowhere. No place else offers 1% edge and a better max bet. The Only place with a bigger max bet is satoshi dice, but between there 1.9% edge and much slower betting interface, they are not a viable option for whales versus J-D.